White Malice

The CIA and the Covert Recolonization of Africa

Pas de couverture

Susan Williams: White Malice (EBook, 2021, PublicAffairs)

eBook, 688 pages

Langue : English

Publié 10 août 2021 par PublicAffairs.

ISBN :
978-1-5417-6828-4
ISBN copié !

Voir sur OpenLibrary

4 étoiles (1 critique)

A revelatory history of how postcolonial African Independence movements were systematically undermined by one nation above all: the US.

In 1958 in Accra, Ghana, the Hands Off Africa conference brought together the leading figures of African independence in a public show of political strength and purpose. Led by the charismatic Kwame Nkrumah, who had just won Ghana’s independence, his determined call for Pan-Africanism was heeded by young, idealistic leaders across the continent and by African Americans seeking civil rights at home. Yet, a moment that signified a new era of African freedom simultaneously marked a new era of foreign intervention and control.

In White Malice, Susan Williams unearths the covert operations pursued by the CIA from Ghana to the Congo to the UN in an effort to frustrate and deny Africa’s new generation of nationalist leaders. This dramatically upends the conventional belief that the African nations failed to establish effective, …

1 édition

a publié une critique de White Malice par Susan Williams

Well-sourced & thorough in the places it covers

4 étoiles

If you are expecting an overview of CIA activity across the continent, the title's a little misleading as it focuses largely on the Congo (DRC, though it covers some important things in Congo-Brazzaville as well) & Ghana. However, those two countries were very important for the overall continental situation & so many interesting connections are made to other places.

With that caveat, the book is quite thorough & does what it aims to do. It gives background as to what evil shit the CIA was up to, why, & how they did it. There are lots & lots of notes explaining where things come from & clear distinctions are made between stuff that was definitely the CIA, stuff that was probably them, & stuff that wasn't. It rather neatly lays out the Cold War context without—as the CIA did—trying to use it to explain everything. It distinguishes carefully between people …